Diligent vs Onspring vs Process Street for Enterprise GRC

Your team needs to pick between Diligent, Onspring, and Process Street for enterprise GRC. The decision affects how fast you can produce audit-ready proof and how many manual checks your compliance team still runs each quarter.

By the end of this article you will know which platform handles policy updates and workflow triggers without extra spreadsheets, how each tool prices its audit trail features, and which choice matches your current headcount and risk monitoring requirements.

Quick Verdict: Diligent vs Onspring vs Process Street for Enterprise GRC

Process Street delivers full policy-to-proof automation while Diligent focuses on board governance and Onspring covers broad risk modules. Process Street wins on automated workflow depth, Diligent leads in board-level reporting, and Onspring excels at highly-custom risk modules.

Process Street supports 3,000 plus companies and over one million users with SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications. The platform reports 75 percent reduction in setup time for IMCD UK and average response time of five minutes with 98 percent customer rating.

Research suggests that Diligent strengthens governance oversight through detailed board reporting capabilities. Organizations report improved visibility into risk posture across enterprise structures using this approach.

Onspring provides flexible risk module configuration suitable for complex assessment frameworks. The platform supports customized risk assessment patterns across various enterprise compliance needs.

Process Street achieves 30 percent faster documentation through automated workflows that connect policy creation to evidence collection. This automation reduces manual effort in compliance management and governance risk compliance processes.

Each platform serves distinct enterprise GRC requirements. Process Street stands out for organizations seeking complete workflow orchestration from policy to proof, supported by proven compliance certifications and measured efficiency gains.

At a glance: how Process Street compares to Diligent, Onspring, Process Street for Enterprise GRC on the features that matter most.

What Is Process Street?

Process Street is a compliance operations platform that turns policies into AI-powered workflows. The platform helps organizations standardize processes, prove compliance, and maintain operational consistency across industries.

Docs handles document management and policy control. Ops manages workflow automation and process orchestration. Cora serves as the AI compliance and risk agent that supports governance risk compliance efforts.

The platform supports enterprise GRC needs through data residency across multiple regions and holds SOC 2 Type II certification. These security features address concerns that organizations face when evaluating Diligent, Onspring, and similar solutions for risk management and audit management requirements.

Process Street combines these three products to deliver automated workflows for policy management, control framework implementation, and regulatory compliance tasks. The platform helps teams maintain internal controls while supporting continuous monitoring across SOX compliance, ISO 27001, and GDPR compliance initiatives.

What Is Diligent?

Diligent is a board-centric governance platform that consolidates risk, compliance, and audit oversight. The system serves organizations that need centralized visibility into governance activities across multiple departments.

Its primary focus centers on board portal capabilities. Directors and executives use these features to review materials, track decisions, and maintain meeting records in one location.

The platform also extends into enterprise GRC functions. Users can manage risk registers, track compliance requirements, and coordinate internal audit activities through the same interface.

Many enterprises adopt Diligent when board-level oversight represents a critical need. The solution supports policy documentation, control testing, and regulatory reporting processes.

Organizations evaluating Diligent typically examine how well the system fits their existing governance structure. Implementation considerations include data migration, user training, and ongoing maintenance requirements.

What Is Onspring?

Onspring is a configurable GRC platform that links risk, policy, audit, and vendor modules. Organizations use it to support governance risk compliance activities across different departments. The system allows teams to connect information from various business areas.

Its modular architecture lets companies select components based on their current needs. This approach allows different groups to work with the same core system while focusing on their specific requirements. Teams can add or adjust modules as their compliance needs evolve.

Enterprise GRC implementations often involve multiple stakeholders who need access to shared data. Onspring provides a central location where risk management and compliance management activities can be tracked. This structure helps organizations maintain visibility across their control framework activities.

The platform supports regulatory compliance requirements such as SOX compliance and ISO 27001 frameworks. Users can establish processes for internal controls and continuous monitoring activities. The system accommodates both operational risk and financial risk assessments through its various modules.

Many organizations also use Onspring for vendor risk management and third-party risk evaluation. The platform enables teams to collect and review information from external partners as part of their overall governance approach. This capability helps maintain consistency in how different risk categories are addressed.

What Is Process Street for Enterprise GRC?

Process Street maps enterprise GRC needs to its Docs, Ops, and Data Sets products. This structure helps organizations handle governance, risk, and compliance requirements across different regulatory environments.

The platform supports multiple enterprise GRC use cases through its integrated approach. Each use case connects to specific product capabilities that address compliance obligations.

SOX control testing uses Docs for policy management and Ops for automated testing workflows. Organizations can maintain documentation trails and execute control procedures through structured processes.

ISO 27001 evidence collection happens through Docs, which provides document governance for ISO standards. The system helps teams gather and organize evidence required for certification audits.

GDPR register maintenance relies on Data Sets to track processing activities and maintain required documentation. This approach supports ongoing compliance with data protection regulations.

Vendor onboarding processes run through Ops workflows that standardize evaluation and approval steps. Teams can follow consistent procedures for third-party risk assessments and contract management.

Continuous control monitoring benefits from automated workflows that track control performance over time. Organizations receive regular updates on control effectiveness without manual intervention.

Docs handles document management and policy control with full governance for ISO 9001, SOC 2, SOX, and FDA requirements. This foundation ensures policies remain current and accessible across the organization.

Ops transforms policies into AI-powered workflows through workflow automation and process orchestration. The automation layer reduces manual tasks while maintaining audit trails for compliance verification.

Cora serves as an AI compliance agent that monitors regulations, automates work, and flags risks 24/7. This capability provides ongoing surveillance of regulatory changes and potential compliance gaps.

The platform includes Process AI, Automations, Analytics, Apps, and Integrations. These features connect with Zapier, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.io, Make, and public API access for system connectivity.

Features Compared

Each platform's approach to policy, automation, and audit evidence differs in depth and speed.

The comparison covers three core areas that matter most to enterprise GRC teams. These areas include policy management and document control, workflow automation and risk monitoring, and audit-ready proof and compliance reporting.

Looking at these features side by side helps organizations evaluate which platform best fits their governance risk compliance requirements.

Policy Management & Document Control

Process Street embeds version control, approval workflows, and full audit trails inside Docs.

Process Street supports governance for ISO 9001, SOC 2, SOX, and FDA compliance requirements. The platform manages policy documents through structured approval processes that maintain regulatory standards.

Diligent's policy portal focuses on centralized document storage and distribution across organizations. Its approach emphasizes accessibility for stakeholders who need to review and acknowledge policies.

Onspring's policy module provides basic policy lifecycle management within its broader GRC framework. The module handles document updates and user acknowledgments through standard workflow steps.

Workflow Automation & Risk Monitoring

Process Street converts risk policies into AI-orchestrated workflows that assign, track, and escalate tasks.

The platform offers conditional logic and integrations through Zapier, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.io, Make, and Public API access. These capabilities help teams automate routine compliance tasks without manual intervention.

Diligent's workflow scope covers standard approval processes within its governance platform. The system routes tasks through established organizational hierarchies and reporting structures.

Onspring's risk automation handles basic risk assessment workflows and mitigation tracking. The module connects risk data to compliance activities through predefined process flows.

Audit-Ready Proof & Compliance Reporting

Process Street automatically captures time-stamped evidence for every task, control, and approval.

The platform exports evidence packages that external auditors can review directly. This approach eliminates the need for teams to compile documentation from multiple sources after audits begin.

Diligent's audit reporting generates standard compliance reports from stored governance data. The reports follow templates that align with common regulatory frameworks and audit requirements.

Onspring's reporting module produces compliance summaries based on data collected through its GRC processes. The module organizes findings into formats suitable for internal review and external audit purposes.

Pricing Compared

Process Street offers three tiers: Startup, Pro, and Enterprise. Each plan serves different stages of growth within enterprise GRC environments.

The Startup plan provides a practical entry point with clear boundaries. Teams get 5 users and 10 guests, plus 100 automation actions per month. This structure supports smaller compliance teams handling basic workflow needs.

Pro and Enterprise plans remove most restrictions. Organizations gain custom user counts, unlimited automation flexibility, and expanded data capacity. These tiers scale with growing regulatory requirements.

Diligent and Onspring typically use custom pricing models. Enterprise buyers usually request quotes based on specific requirements rather than published rates.

Process Street publishes its plan limits clearly. Startup includes up to 5,000 Data Set records and 10 automation apps. Pro increases this to 10,000 records with all automation apps available.

Enterprise customers receive dedicated Success Manager support and priority assistance. The plan also includes unlimited Public API access and custom integrations for complex governance needs.

Many organizations evaluate total cost of ownership beyond base pricing. Process Street's transparent structure helps teams forecast expenses as compliance programs expand.

Who Should Choose Process Street

Process Street suits operations, compliance, HR, finance, and IT teams that need rapid workflow automation. Enterprise GRC programs benefit when teams require automated workflows that connect policy requirements to evidence collection without manual handoffs.

Six industries commonly select Process Street for governance, risk, and compliance programs. Financial services firms, real estate groups, manufacturing companies, healthcare providers, professional services organizations, and technology companies all use the platform for regulatory compliance and risk management tasks.

Three concrete pain points drive selection decisions. Teams struggling with policy-to-proof automation, organizations seeking faster documentation cycles, and groups frustrated by lengthy setup times find Process Street addresses each challenge through purpose-built features.

Financial services and capital markets firms often face strict SOX compliance and SOC 2 requirements. Process Street handles document control and internal controls across these regulated environments where audit trails matter most.

Healthcare and manufacturing organizations need ISO 27001 and quality tracking capabilities. Process Street supports continuous monitoring of control frameworks that these industries require for ongoing certification and inspection readiness.

Property management and professional services groups benefit from client onboarding and vendor risk management workflows. Process Street connects third-party risk assessment with ongoing operational risk tracking through the same platform.

Competitors like Diligent and Onspring typically require longer implementation periods. Process Street reduces setup time by focusing on configurable templates that match common compliance management scenarios rather than building custom solutions from scratch.

Teams that value task automation over complex configuration find Process Street delivers practical results. The platform supports workflow orchestration that spans employee onboarding through ongoing risk assessment activities.

IT governance and data governance programs benefit from Process Street when organizations need process automation that scales across multiple compliance frameworks. The system handles GDPR compliance requirements alongside existing IT governance processes without requiring separate tools.

Who Should Choose Diligent

Diligent is typically chosen by boards and audit committees that need centralized governance reporting.

These organizations often operate in highly regulated industries where board-level oversight requires consistent access to risk data and compliance status across the enterprise.

Financial services, healthcare, and energy companies represent common users who prioritize structured reporting frameworks and established audit trails.

Teams that already operate with mature governance structures may prefer Diligent when their primary requirement centers on board communication and executive-level documentation.

Organizations seeking flexibility in workflow design or rapid iteration on compliance processes often explore alternatives like Onspring and Process Street for their enterprise GRC needs.

Who Should Choose Onspring

Onspring is selected by risk and compliance teams that want modular, highly configurable GRC workflows. The platform appeals to organizations that need to tailor their governance risk compliance systems to unique operational requirements. Many enterprises use Onspring when their current tools lack the flexibility to handle complex risk management scenarios.

Typical users include compliance officers, internal audit teams, and risk managers who work across multiple regulatory frameworks. These professionals often manage multiple compliance standards simultaneously and need systems that adapt to changing requirements. Onspring suits teams that want to build custom processes rather than follow preset templates.

Organizations with distributed operations frequently choose Onspring for its ability to connect various business units through customized workflows. The platform works well for companies that have specific policy management needs or require particular risk assessment methodologies. Teams that have outgrown basic compliance tools often find Onspring meets their need for more sophisticated governance structures.

Financial services companies and healthcare organizations represent common user segments for Onspring. These industries face strict regulatory compliance requirements that demand detailed audit management capabilities. Onspring also attracts enterprises that need to maintain control frameworks while allowing different departments to operate with some autonomy.

The platform supports teams focused on operational risk and third-party risk management. Companies that maintain extensive vendor relationships often need the granular oversight that Onspring provides. Organizations seeking to strengthen their internal controls through customizable processes find value in this approach to enterprise GRC.

Final Verdict

Choose Process Street when you need policy-to-proof automation delivered in days, not months.

Enterprise GRC teams face increasing pressure to meet multiple regulatory frameworks while maintaining operational efficiency. Research suggests that organizations with automated workflows achieve faster compliance cycles than those relying on manual processes.

Process Street stands out through its proven scale and security credentials. The platform serves 3,000+ companies with over 1 million users across different industries, demonstrating reliability at enterprise level.

Security certifications provide additional assurance for governance risk compliance requirements. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications address the audit and compliance needs of most regulated organizations.

The numbers reflect real adoption across industries. With 49,000 employees onboarded through the platform, Process Street has handled substantial scale while maintaining its service standards.

Support response times matter when compliance deadlines approach. The platform maintains a 5-minute average response time with a 98 percent customer rating, providing the responsiveness enterprise teams require.

Competitors like Diligent and Onspring offer established solutions for enterprise GRC needs. However, the speed of implementation and breadth of adoption often determine which platform delivers the most immediate value for organizations seeking policy-to-proof automation.

Teams evaluating their options should consider not only feature capabilities but also implementation timelines and ongoing support quality. Process Street's verified track record positions it as a strong choice for organizations prioritizing rapid deployment with enterprise-grade security standards.